France: Scientists recommend changing coronavirus vaccination technique after AstraZeneca thrombosis investigation

Astrazeneca, Coronavirus, Europe, France, Health, Janssen, Moderna, Pfizer/Biontech, Science, Side Effects, Sinovac, Sputnik V, Treatment, Vaccine, Vaccine aspiration

Thus, one of the hypotheses linking the vaccine to the occurrence of severe thrombosis could be an accidental intravenous injection which, in the presence of factors not fully identified, would generate a discordant immune reaction with activation of the platelets, potentially associated with a NET effect or with a decrease in the level of ACE2 on the surface of endothelial cells, leading to an increased risk of thrombosis. A simple way to overcome this hypothetical accidental intravascular injection could be to verify the absence of blood return during vaccination [aspiration], which is not currently recommended by the [French] Ministry of Health


Original excerpt In French:

Ainsi, l’une des hypothèses liant le vaccin à la survenue de thrombose grave pourrait être une injection intraveineuse accidentelle qui, en présence de facteurs non intégralement identifiés, engendrerait une réaction immunitaire discordante avec activation des plaquettes, potentiellement associé à un effet NET ou à une diminution du taux d’ACE2 à la surface des cellules endothéliales, conduisant à un sur-risque thrombotique.

Un moyen simple de pallier cette hypothétique injection intravasculaire accidentelle pourrait être de vérifier l’absence de retour sanguin lors de la vaccination, ce que ne recommande actuellement pas le ministère de la santé

From a technically detailed report by “Du côté de la science” (On the side of science) – In French


See also: Denmark’s SSI recommends changes to syringe injection method for #coronavirus vaccines

See also: Adenovirus-induced thrombocytopenia – aspiration before vaccination with #coronavirus vaccines!


** This post was originally published on April 5, 2021 **